Recs

  1. International AI Safety Report 2026

    Yoshua Bengio (chair) + 100 experts, 30+ govts

    The closest thing to a neutral, authoritative baseline. 220 pages; use the 3-page Executive Summary or 20-page Policymaker Summary. Start here.

    ReportSafety / synthesisNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  2. Machines of Loving Grace

    Dario Amodei

    The clearest statement of what the prize is if things go well. Pairs with Adolescence of Technology for the risk side.

    EssayVisionFrontier-lab optimist

    (opens in a new tab)
  3. The Adolescence of Technology

    Dario Amodei

    The risk-side companion to Machines of Loving Grace: what has to go right (alignment, interpretability, governance) to reach the good outcome.

    EssaySafety / visionFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  4. AI 2027

    Kokotajlo, Alexander, Larsen, Lifland, Dean (AI Futures Project)

    The vivid scenario that anchors most fast-takeoff conversations. Date-stamp it: the authors publish quarterly updates and have moved in both directions since.

    ScenarioForecast / scenarioShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  5. METR + Redwood: Independent investigation of the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident

    METR (Wijk, Cotra) + Redwood (Greenblatt)

    The first major real-world agent-misalignment incident: ~1,200 OpenAI agents used an unsanctioned message board to coordinate benchmark cheating; 700 joined an offshoot attack on Hugging Face. The single most important safety artifact of 2026.

    ReportSafety / incidentNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  6. Why I don't think AGI is right around the corner

    Dwarkesh Patel

    Best credible counterweight. Key line: models get more impressive at the rate short-timelines people predict, but more useful at the rate long-timelines people predict.

    EssayForecastSkeptic (inside the tent)

    (opens in a new tab)
  7. Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead

    Leopold Aschenbrenner

    The compute-buildout + national-security thesis. Influential and explicitly a thesis, not a neutral forecast. Frozen at Jun 2024.

    EssayInfra / natsecShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  8. The Bitter Lesson

    Rich Sutton

    One page. Why scale beat cleverness. Bedrock for understanding why compute matters.

    EssayFoundationalNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  9. Statement on AI Risk

    Center for AI Safety

    One sentence signed by the field's leadership. The clearest proof risk concern is not fringe.

    StatementSafetySafety-concern

    (opens in a new tab)
  10. Anthropic: Core Views on AI Safety

    Anthropic

    How the lab frames the problem in its own words.

    Primary docGovernanceFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  11. Anthropic: Responsible Scaling Policy

    AnthropicUpdated

    The template most frontier safety frameworks copied. Note FLI's Summer 2026 index reports labs have weakened unilateral-pause pledges.

    Primary docGovernanceFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  12. OpenAI: Preparedness Framework

    OpenAI

    OpenAI's equivalent. Read alongside the RSP and the DeepMind FSF.

    Primary docGovernanceFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  13. Google DeepMind: Frontier Safety Framework

    Google DeepMindUpdated

    DeepMind's framework. Spot-check URL (search: Frontier Safety Framework).

    Primary docGovernanceFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  14. Stanford HAI AI Index 2026

    Stanford HAI

    The annual data bible. 2026 edition: industry produced 90%+ of frontier models; SWE-bench Verified went 60% to near 100% in a year; US/China lead traded repeatedly.

    ReportData / synthesisNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  15. FLI AI Safety Index, Summer 2026

    Future of Life Institute

    Independent grading of frontier labs. Anthropic top overall; three failing grades (xAI, DeepSeek, Mistral); flags weakened pause commitments and the pivot to military work.

    ReportScorecardSafety-concern

    (opens in a new tab)
  16. Risk & Reward: 2024 AI Assurance Technology Market Report

    Juniper Ventures

    Our own synthesis. Position as thesis, not neutral source.

    ReportEconomics / assuranceJuniper (own)

    (opens in a new tab)
  17. Can AI Scaling Continue Through 2030?

    Epoch AI

    Bottlenecks are power and chips, not algorithms. Still the reference on physical limits.

    ReportInfraNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  18. Dylan Patel — Lab economics and the road to 100+ GW

    Dwarkesh Patel, Dylan Patel

    Labs shifting from inference to monetizing compute; wafer/fab limits; capex and debt implications of scaling to 100+ GW. Best current infra primer for an LP.

    PodcastInfra / economicsIndustry

    (opens in a new tab)
  19. Dylan Patel — The three bottlenecks to scaling AI compute

    Dwarkesh Patel, Dylan Patel

    Deep dive on the three physical constraints on scaling compute.

    PodcastInfraIndustry

    (opens in a new tab)
  20. AI and Our Economic Future

    Chad Jones et al., Journal of Economic Perspectives

    Mainstream economics takes transformative AI seriously. Good for an LP who wants the macro case from a non-AI-insider.

    ReportEconomicsAcademic

    (opens in a new tab)
  21. Alex Imas and Phil Trammell — What remains scarce after AGI?

    Dwarkesh Patel

    The questions only economics can answer about AGI: growth, wages, capital returns.

    PodcastEconomicsAcademic

    (opens in a new tab)
  22. The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis

    Citrini Research

    A financial-markets variant of the takeoff scenario. Speaks an LP's language; treat as provocation, not forecast.

    EssayEconomics / scenarioFinance-native takeoff

    (opens in a new tab)
  23. AI 2040: Plan A

    Kokotajlo, Larsen, Lifland, Dean, Greenblatt, Halstead

    The AI 2027 team's 'least bad plan we know of'. The constructive follow-up to the scenario.

    ScenarioForecast / governanceShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  24. How to pace the US frontier

    AI Futures Project

    Tentative domestic AI regulation proposals from the AI 2027 team.

    ArticleGovernanceShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  25. Ryan Greenblatt — What happens once AI can automate AI research?

    Dwarkesh Patel, Ryan Greenblatt (Redwood)

    Human-level AI ~2030-31 could compress 5 years of progress into 1; verifiable training, reward hacking, takeover pathways.

    PodcastForecast / takeoffShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  26. Preparing for the Intelligence Explosion

    Forethought (MacAskill, Moorhouse)

    What a compressed century of progress would demand of institutions.

    ReportForecast / strategyShort timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  27. Broad AI Timelines: Planning Under Uncertainty

    Forethought

    Every credible timeline distribution has an 80% interval 50+ years wide. The antidote to false precision.

    EssayForecastNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  28. Ege Erdil & Tamay Besiroglu: AGI is still 30 years away

    Dwarkesh Patel

    The rigorous multi-decade case, from Epoch/Mechanize co-founders. Essential balance.

    PodcastForecastLong timelines

    (opens in a new tab)
  29. What the hell happened with AGI timelines in 2025?

    80,000 Hours (Rob Wiblin)

    Clean narrative of the 2025 sentiment swing (short after o1/o3, then back out). Good LP explainer.

    PodcastForecastNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  30. How well did forecasters predict 2025 AI progress?

    Epoch AI + AI Futures + AI Digest

    Forecasters mostly right on benchmarks, mixed on real-world impact, and underestimated revenue.

    ArticleForecastNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  31. METR Frontier Risk Report (Feb-Mar 2026)

    METR

    First entity-based third-party assessment: Anthropic, Google, Meta, OpenAI shared internal models. Means/motive/opportunity framing; 44 misalignment incidents catalogued; a METR red-teamer disabled Anthropic's monitors.

    ReportSafety / evalsNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  32. Investigating three real-world incidents in our cybersecurity evaluations

    Anthropic

    Anthropic's disclosure that three Claude models breached real organizations during evals they mistook for simulations. Read with the OpenAI/HF incident.

    ReportSafety / incidentFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  33. OpenAI technical report: Hugging Face incident

    OpenAI

    OpenAI's own account. Key admission: the company did not know its agents had breached Hugging Face until a week later.

    ReportSafety / incidentFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  34. Fortune: what the OpenAI and METR reports say, and don't

    Fortune

    The LP-readable summary of the incident and the two reports.

    ArticleSafety / incidentJournalism

    (opens in a new tab)
  35. Ajeya Cotra — Inside the OpenAI agent swarm that hacked Hugging Face

    Dwarkesh Patel, Ajeya Cotra

    Impossible tasks, secret message boards, transcript tampering, why the attack targeted evasion not answers. Best audio explainer of the incident.

    PodcastSafety / incidentNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  36. The Rise and Fall of Agent Civilizations

    Dwarkesh Patel

    Whether agent swarms that build secret channels resemble civilizations, and what fast coordination means for takeover risk.

    EssaySafety / incidentAnalyst

    (opens in a new tab)
  37. Anthropic Sabotage Risk Report (Claude Opus 4.6) + METR review

    Anthropic; METR

    Template for lab risk reports with independent external review.

    ReportSafety / evalsNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  38. Countering misuse of AI: September 2026

    Anthropic

    Threat intel across cyber, influence ops, surveillance, bio, weapons, distillation (Dec 2025 to Aug 2026).

    ReportSafety / misuseFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  39. Anthropic vs The Pentagon (DoW essay)

    Dwarkesh Patel

    Lab-government friction, surveillance, 'alignment to whom'. Governance is now a live business risk.

    EssayGovernance / natsecAnalyst

    (opens in a new tab)
  40. Dario Amodei — We are near the end of the exponential

    Dwarkesh Patel, Dario Amodei

    'A country of geniuses in a data center' a few years out. The CEO-level view in long form.

    PodcastVision / forecastFrontier-lab

    (opens in a new tab)
  41. Superintelligence

    Nick Bostrom

    The original x-risk framing. Dated on mechanism, still the conceptual root.

    BookSafety / foundationalSafety-concern

    (opens in a new tab)
  42. Human Compatible

    Stuart Russell

    The most measured academic case from a mainstream AI researcher.

    BookSafety / foundationalSafety-concern

    (opens in a new tab)
  43. The Alignment Problem

    Brian Christian

    Best-written on-ramp for a non-technical reader.

    BookSafety / foundationalNeutral

    (opens in a new tab)
  44. If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies

    Eliezer Yudkowsky, Nate Soares

    The pole position: ASI would outcompete us; stop before the threshold. Include as the pole, with a skeptic alongside.

    BookSafetyHard doom

    (opens in a new tab)
  45. AI Snake Oil

    Arvind Narayanan, Sayash Kapoor

    The credible 'overhyped' pole. Including it signals you are not selling a bubble.

    BookSocietal riskSkeptic

    (opens in a new tab)
  46. Co-Intelligence

    Ethan Mollick

    The practical work-and-education adoption lens; useful for LPs who want 'what does this mean for my business'.

    BookAdoptionPractitioner

    (opens in a new tab)
  47. The AI Dilemma (talk)

    Tristan Harris, Aza Raskin (CHT)

    The public-facing risk talk; dated on specifics, still the best 60-minute framing for a general audience.

    TalkSocietal riskSafety-concern

    (opens in a new tab)
  48. Something Big Is Happening

    Matt Shumer

    Went viral as the normie 'wake-up' piece. Author is an AI founder with a hype track record; include only as the mainstream on-ramp, not as evidence.

    EssayAdoption / on-rampHype-flagged

    (opens in a new tab)
  49. AI strategy, governance, and power concentration: a reading guide

    Luke Drago

    Article

    (opens in a new tab)